HERBARIUM
A sensor does not measure
the room.
It measures one physical condition
at one sensing element
in one location
across one period of response.
The screen may say:
25.4°C.
61% relative humidity.
1.23 kPa VPD.
The decimals look complete.
The measurement is not.
The sensor may report that condition accurately.
The grower may still interpret it incorrectly.
That is the first lesson:
A number can be true and still fail to represent
the place the grower thinks it represents.
Every environmental reading should be able to answer:
Without those answers, “the room was 26°C and 60% RH”
is incomplete.
The room may contain
many temperatures and humidities at once.
A dense canopy modifies radiation, airflow and water-vapour distribution. Supply air, extraction, plant transpiration and equipment create further spatial gradients.
One sensor can be useful.
It cannot prove uniformity.
Better lesson:
A sensor reading has an address.
Remove the address and part of the meaning disappears.
“I bought two identical meters.
They do not show the same number.”
Good. Now the measurement has become interesting.
Two devices may disagree because:
Before deciding that one device is defective,
place them together under the same conditions.
Give them:
Then compare them across more than one condition.
One device may show a nearly constant offset.
Another may agree around 50% RH but diverge at higher humidity.
A one-point comparison
cannot reveal the complete response curve.
If the difference matters operationally, compare the sensors with a suitable reference or have them calibrated across the range in which they will be used.
Two matching displays do not prove accuracy.
Two disagreeing displays do not prove
that either device is useless.
A display reading 24.37°C may look more trustworthy than one reading 24°C.
The extra digits prove only that the device displays smaller increments.
They do not prove that the underlying measurement is correct to the same number of decimal places.
Four terms should remain separate:
Calibration is also not automatically adjustment.
A device may be calibrated, its error documented and no internal correction applied. A grower should therefore read the specification before admiring the decimal places.
The most expensive-looking number
may still carry an uncertainty
larger than the change being discussed.
Better lesson:
Precision is not accuracy.
A decimal can be uncertainty wearing jewellery.
Relative humidity is not a direct statement of how many grams of water vapour occupy the room.
It expresses the actual water-vapour pressure relative to the saturation vapour pressure at the same temperature.
Relative humidity can therefore change when temperature changes even if the actual amount of water vapour in the air changes very little.
Warm the air:
the same vapour content may produce a lower RH.
Cool the air:
the same vapour content may produce a higher RH.
This is why temperature error becomes humidity-interpretation error.
A combined sensor warmed by direct radiation may report:
The three numbers may appear to confirm one another because they were derived from the same local measurement error.
Dew point answers a related but different question:
at what temperature would the current air reach saturation?
That makes dew point useful when evaluating condensation risk on cold leaves, walls, ducts or equipment.
The moisture did not suddenly appear
when RH rose overnight.
The air may simply have cooled
towards its dew point.
Growers often calculate VPD from:
This produces air VPD: the difference between saturation vapour pressure at the measured air temperature and the actual vapour pressure of the air.
Water-vapour exchange from a leaf is driven more directly by the gradient between the approximately saturated internal leaf air spaces and the surrounding air.
Because saturation vapour pressure depends on temperature, a leaf warmer or cooler than the measured air can produce a different leaf-to-air vapour-pressure gradient.
Air movement, stomatal behaviour, radiation, plant water status and leaf position can all influence that difference.
This does not make an air-temperature VPD calculation useless.
It makes its definition important.
A chart calculated from air temperature and RH should not be silently presented as though leaf temperature had been measured.
A leaf-to-air VPD requires:
A defensible infrared leaf-temperature measurement also requires attention to:
VPD is not a commandment attached to one universal stage chart.
It is an atmospheric variable whose biological consequence depends on plant response, light, airflow, water supply, genotype and development.
Better lesson:
Air VPD describes the atmospheric deficit calculated at air temperature.
Leaf-to-air VPD estimates the vapour-pressure gradient
involving the temperature of the leaf.
Do not use one name
while measuring the other.
A calibrated sensor in the wrong location
can control the wrong microclimate perfectly.
There is no single magic placement for every purpose.
Placement should follow the question.
Do not place it:
As the canopy changes height and density, the representative location may also change.
A second sensor can serve a different purpose:
The control sensor and the diagnostic sensor do not need to occupy the same place.
One helps operate the room.
The other helps reveal what the room is hiding.
A sensor does not respond instantly.
It has a time constant.
Condensation can create another problem.
A sensor that becomes wet may remain near saturation, recover slowly or show temporary error after the surrounding air has changed.
Logging interval matters too.
A reading stored every fifteen minutes cannot describe every one-minute event.
An hourly average can hide:
Min–max values help,
but they do not show sequence or duration.
The grower should know:
A number without time
is another incomplete measurement.
Barometric pressure describes the pressure exerted by the atmosphere at a location.
It changes with elevation and weather systems.
That can provide useful outdoor context.
It is not the same measurement as the pressure difference between:
Airflow through buildings and ventilation systems depends on pressure differences created by fans, wind, stack effect and flow resistance.
To determine whether a room is positive or negative relative to another space, the grower needs a differential-pressure instrument with appropriate reference points.
A single-point barometric reading cannot provide that answer.
Absolute atmospheric pressure can affect air density and precise psychrometric calculations. Ordinary weather-scale changes are usually secondary, however, to temperature, humidity, leaf temperature, airflow and water supply in a small cultivation environment.
Use barometric pressure to understand:
Do not use it as a substitute for:
Better lesson:
A falling barometer may describe
the weather approaching the building.
It does not tell you
whether the grow room is under negative pressure.
A monitoring sensor can mislead the grower.
A control sensor can move equipment.
That difference matters.
Automation does not correct a bad measurement.
It repeats the error
with electrical authority.
A stable control system needs more than a setpoint:
The controller should also fail visibly.
A missing sensor, frozen value or impossible reading should create an alarm—not quiet confidence.
Data should be reviewed as trends:
The purpose of automation is not to remove judgement.
It is to apply verified decisions
more consistently.
A serious grower does not need
the most expensive dashboard.
They need measurements whose limitations are understood.
Record:
And remember:
the plant is not living in the dashboard.
It is living in a three-dimensional environment
the dashboard is attempting to sample.
The sensor is not lying
merely because the plant disagrees.
The plant may be responding
to a condition the sensor never sampled.
Every reading contains:
Remove any one of them
and the number becomes easier to misuse.
A display is not the room.
A reading is not the crop.
And automation is not understanding
simply because it reacts quickly.
Factual Note
Temperature and relative-humidity sensors measure the environment at their sensing elements, not an abstract room average. Location, height, airflow, radiation exposure, nearby wet or cold surfaces and the structure of the crop can all influence the recorded value. Greenhouse research has shown that the best sensor location for estimating an overall average may differ from the locations needed to detect poorly controlled zones.
Resolution, repeatability, accuracy and calibration are different properties. A display with additional decimal places has greater displayed resolution but not necessarily greater accuracy. Calibration compares an instrument with known reference conditions and documents its response and uncertainty; it does not necessarily mean the device has been internally adjusted.
Relative humidity depends on temperature. A temperature error can therefore affect both the reported RH and any VPD calculated from that temperature–humidity pair. Sensors exposed to radiation or local equipment streams may produce internally consistent temperature, RH and VPD values that are not representative of the crop environment. Controlled-environment measurements should use suitable placement and radiation protection.
Air VPD is the difference between saturation vapour pressure at the measured air temperature and the actual vapour pressure of the air. A leaf-to-air vapour-pressure gradient instead uses saturation vapour pressure at leaf temperature and may therefore differ when the leaf is warmer or cooler than the surrounding air. These quantities should be named and interpreted separately. Plant responses to VPD also depend on species, genotype, light, water status and other environmental conditions.
Sensor response time, sampling interval and data-logging interval affect the events that become visible. Short temperature or humidity excursions may be delayed, averaged or missed. Condensation, contamination and ageing may also alter humidity-sensor behaviour, so comparison should include stabilisation time and more than one environmental condition.
Barometric pressure is atmospheric pressure at a location. It is not equivalent to the differential pressure between a cultivation room and an adjacent space. Directional airflow and building pressurisation are assessed through pressure differences associated with fans, wind, stack effect and system resistance.
Much of the detailed evidence on greenhouse sensor placement, VPD and environmental control comes from crops other than cannabis. The measurement principles are broadly relevant, but fixed cannabis thresholds and universal placement rules require crop- and facility-specific validation.
A living archive of cannabis—its cultivation in practice and its traces across science, culture, language, power and memory.
Join early.
Keep the archive open.
The VADEMECUM is becoming a living archive of guides, tools, notes and practical plant knowledge.
Free member access. Join early. Keep the archive open.
Join early.
Keep the
archive open.
The VADEMECUM is not just a book anymore. It is becoming a living archive of guides, tools, notes and practical plant knowledge.
Free member access. Join early. Keep the archive open.
The VADEMECUM is becoming a living archive of practical plant knowledge.
Free member access.